Following on from my ORK Brooklyn poster post <link> I went in search of a London map. I found one, thanks wikipedia. But what I don’t get is that the allocation seems totally random. Surely N1 should be next to N2.
-
1
Pingback on Apr 21st, 2008 at 12:01 pm
[...] poster <link> and the challenges of doing the same with the London postcode map <link>. This different take on the same idea cleverly presents the streets of central London. Here [...]
-
2
Pingback on Aug 3rd, 2008 at 1:18 pm
[...] geography to this postcode map really adds value. Here’s my original post on the subject <link> No Comments Leave a Commenttrackback addressThere was an error with your comment, please [...]











May 31, 2008 at 5:26 pm
Ok, you are a little stupid. You probably think you’re a so smart. But the reason why nș 1 isn’t next to nș2 is because the map is divided in west, northwest, etc.
So, putting nș1 next to nș2 would be wrong.
June 21, 2008 at 9:26 am
The person who left the first comment is both rude and stupid. The reason is that, after the 1 postcode district which is where the head sorting office is, the postcodes are numbered alphabetically, SE2 = Abey Wood, SE3 = Blackheath etc.
October 15, 2008 at 4:46 pm
how can it be right that its sorted alphabetically. N1 is islington, and N2 is Finchley. So how does that work?
December 11, 2008 at 6:04 pm
Yes it is alphabetical – The 1 code – ie N1, W1, NW1 etc is the exception as the areas historic sorting hq, but then it goes mostly alphabetically: N2=East Finchley N3=Finchley N4=Finsbury Park, N5=Highbury etc.
Someone could help me with NW11 though cos that is Golders Green and not in alphabetical order
February 7, 2009 at 3:36 am
I found your site on google and read a few of your other posts. Keep up the good work.